<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for figuring out computer science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://focs.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://focs.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>What and why and more about computer science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:54:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How to study computer science by someonewhocare</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/how-to-study-computer-science/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>someonewhocare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/how-to-study-computer-science/#comment-427</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve studied in Germany as exchange student for one year and I should say that german informatik(they say it is a CS) is something like between software engineering and com. programming. In my opinion the name of &quot;CS&quot; should be given to this deps.

By the way, the 4.and 7.topics are not related with CS at all=)(my idea)
CS is shortly: knowing arch of Comp, computaional theory, DS, Automata The.,math(like linear algebra,diff.equ,numerical analy.,stats...) and so on ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve studied in Germany as exchange student for one year and I should say that german informatik(they say it is a CS) is something like between software engineering and com. programming. In my opinion the name of &#8220;CS&#8221; should be given to this deps.</p>
<p>By the way, the 4.and 7.topics are not related with CS at all=)(my idea)<br />
CS is shortly: knowing arch of Comp, computaional theory, DS, Automata The.,math(like linear algebra,diff.equ,numerical analy.,stats&#8230;) and so on <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who is this Alan Turing guy? by Loai Najati</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/10/02/who-is-this-alan-turing-guy/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Loai Najati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/10/02/who-is-this-alan-turing-guy/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>duh, If you&#039;re looking for some respectful article, be at least respectful!. 

Thanks Andreas. But, you should improve your English writing style. But, it&#039;s  really a good article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>duh, If you&#8217;re looking for some respectful article, be at least respectful!. </p>
<p>Thanks Andreas. But, you should improve your English writing style. But, it&#8217;s  really a good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The A in RSA by Alex Nikolov</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/adleman-replies/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Nikolov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/adleman-replies/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>I feel that a result settling P ?= NP will be useful whatever the answer is. This is also a deep theoretical problem. However, many theoreticians don&#039;t actively work on it because they need to publish in order to get PhD&#039;s/get tenure/etc. Focusing solely on such a hard problem is the luxury of ppl with secure positions in academia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that a result settling P ?= NP will be useful whatever the answer is. This is also a deep theoretical problem. However, many theoreticians don&#8217;t actively work on it because they need to publish in order to get PhD&#8217;s/get tenure/etc. Focusing solely on such a hard problem is the luxury of ppl with secure positions in academia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to study computer science by SYED AZHAR SHAH</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/how-to-study-computer-science/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>SYED AZHAR SHAH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/how-to-study-computer-science/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I think in the first two years only dot net 2005 should be thought as it has everything in it like SQL, C++, and ASP.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in the first two years only dot net 2005 should be thought as it has everything in it like SQL, C++, and ASP.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hello world! by Language design &#171; figuring out computer science</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/hello-world/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Language design &#171; figuring out computer science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/hello-world/#comment-349</guid>
		<description>[...]  I&#8217;m too busy to pursue this blog further, but i just got one more reply to my big question from Paul Graham. Sorry to be so long replying. It was largely because I wasn&#8217;t sure what to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  I&#8217;m too busy to pursue this blog further, but i just got one more reply to my big question from Paul Graham. Sorry to be so long replying. It was largely because I wasn&#8217;t sure what to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 9 Tips how to give a technical presentation by shailly</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/9-tips-how-to-give-a-technical-presentation/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>shailly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/9-tips-how-to-give-a-technical-presentation/#comment-348</guid>
		<description>nice artical...learn a lot from this..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice artical&#8230;learn a lot from this..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Read also: Good Math, Bad Math by Recent Links Tagged With "picalculus" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/04/read-also-good-math-bad-math/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "picalculus" - JabberTags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/04/read-also-good-math-bad-math/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>[...] public links &gt;&gt; picalculus   Read also: Good Math, Bad Math Saved by shyboy77ni on Thu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; picalculus   Read also: Good Math, Bad Math Saved by shyboy77ni on Thu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t learn Rails! by Gene</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/dont-learn-rails/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/dont-learn-rails/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Maybe you forgot that while the theorists trot around, burning through millions of investor dollars to (hopefully) revolutionize the world someday, some pragmatist out there has to actually do those &quot;menial&quot; web engineering jobs because the world can&#039;t wait on that life-changing breakthrough--people need consumables every single day. It&#039;s amazing how often brilliance mutates into arrogance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you forgot that while the theorists trot around, burning through millions of investor dollars to (hopefully) revolutionize the world someday, some pragmatist out there has to actually do those &#8220;menial&#8221; web engineering jobs because the world can&#8217;t wait on that life-changing breakthrough&#8211;people need consumables every single day. It&#8217;s amazing how often brilliance mutates into arrogance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t learn Rails! by Paul</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/dont-learn-rails/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/dont-learn-rails/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Don’t bet your career on web engineering” — that would have been a good title.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

\and hoe did he1d get our attention to the article?
Nice strategy, pal! and a well written article too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Don’t bet your career on web engineering” — that would have been a good title.</p></blockquote>
<p>\and hoe did he1d get our attention to the article?<br />
Nice strategy, pal! and a well written article too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Computer science vs software engineering by Jose</title>
		<link>http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/10/computer-science-vs-software-engineering/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://focs.wordpress.com/2007/09/10/computer-science-vs-software-engineering/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, having a computer science degree to develop web/desktop &quot;business&quot; applications is like getting a law degree to be in sales.  If computer science majors want to apply their learned skills, would they not be better off developing complex software used by NASA, defense military and such?

I agree with jrdittmann, I also see computer science majors as those that build tools for developing software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, having a computer science degree to develop web/desktop &#8220;business&#8221; applications is like getting a law degree to be in sales.  If computer science majors want to apply their learned skills, would they not be better off developing complex software used by NASA, defense military and such?</p>
<p>I agree with jrdittmann, I also see computer science majors as those that build tools for developing software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
